Buffers improve water quality

Buffer stripCan we really see a difference in water quality in streams from sites where there are buffers compared to sites without buffers?

To answer this question, the MPCA looked at the quality of the buffers next to and upstream of more than 3,500 fish monitoring sites and 3,000 invertebrate monitoring sites across Minnesota. We focused on biology because that reflects conditions of water quality over time. Buffer quality was measured by calculating the percentage of the buffer area that was undisturbed by human activities.

What we found

Our analysis of data and information clearly shows that buffers are important for clean water and healthy aquatic life (fish and bugs). And that the greater the percentage of stream channel that is buffered upstream of a monitoring site, the better the health of the aquatic life. Watersheds with missing or disturbed buffers have less healthy fish and bug (invertebrate) communities.

The buffer zone is critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat due to its immediate proximity to the water.

On average, streams with:

  • More than 85% intact buffers have excellent aquatic life
  • About 50% – 85% intact buffers have good aquatic life
  • Between 25% – 50% intact buffers have fair aquatic life
  • Less than 25% intact buffers have poor or very poor aquatic life

We compared the buffer quality to the health of the fish and invertebrate communities at each site. The sites were grouped into “excellent,” “good,” “fair,” “poor,” and “very poor” categories based on the health of the biological community.

Graph shows that undisturbed buffers correlate with better aquatic life

Here are four examples — two from relatively channelized streams and two from streams that have not been significantly altered.

Lower Minnesota buffers

County Ditch 13A is a headwater, channelized tributary to the South Branch of the Rush River in Sibley County. The buffer zone of this stream is in poor condition and dominated by row-crop agriculture. The fish and invertebrate community as well as the in-stream habitat are all severely degraded.

Land use  in Lower Mississipppi watershedLand use in buffer zone in Lower Mississipppi watershed

Stream monitoring results in Lower Mississipppi watershed

aerial shot of Zumbro river

The North Fork of the Zumbro River is a channelized tributary to the Zumbro River in Rice County. The buffer zones of streams in this watershed are generally in poor condition, but the buffer zone around and immediately upstream of the monitoring site is more intact. The fish and invertebrate community reflect the somewhat better habitat conditions at the site.

Land use in Zumbro River watershedLand use in buffers in Zumbro River watershedMonitoring  results in Zumbro River watershed

aerial photo Blue Earth River

The Blue Earth River is a large, direct tributary to the Minnesota River.  The buffer zone of this stream’s watershed is often encroached upon by row-crop agriculture. At this monitoring location, the buffer zone around and immediately upstream of the site is somewhat intact, but cropland encroaches on the stream banks in several places and may be contributing to bank erosion along some outside bends. Note the erosion evident in the lower right corner of the air photo and site picture above. 

Land use in Blue Earth RiverLand use in buffers distribution in  Blue Earth River watershedmonitoring data from Blue Earthwatershed

aerial photo of Sauk River watershed

Silver Creek is a tributary to the Sauk River in Todd County. The buffer zone at the monitoring site is composed of perennial grasses that may be grazed at times. The stream has good channel development and a stream bottom composed of coarse substrates that are not covered by fine sediments. The intact buffer at this site may somewhat mitigate the impact on the biology of land use practices in the upstream watershed. 

Land use distribution in Sauk River watershedLand use in buffers in Sauk River watershedMonitoring in Sauk River watershed